Language Arts/English Language Proficiency Materials Selection Committee- Grades 6-12
-
Elementary classroom teachers
-
LA/ELP specialists
-
Parent/Guardians/Community Members
-
School administrators
-
Teaching specialists, including but not limited to special education, multilingual, dual language, advanced program and additional content areas
All stakeholders are welcome to submit comments and questions throughout the Language Arts / English Language Proficiency Curriculum Adoption Process
To submit a question or comment please complete the LA/ ELP Curriculum Response Form
Meeting Schedule 4:30 - 6:30 Location TBD
09/18/24, 10/16/24 10/23/24, 11/13/24 (4:30-7:30), 12/04/24 (new addition) 12/11/24, 01/22/25, 2/12/25, 2/26/25 (new addition), 3/18/25, 4/16/25, 5/14/25
District Administrative Office (DAO) 1260 NW Waterhouse Avenue Beaverton, OR 97006 District
Service Center (DSC) 16550 SW Merlo Road Beaverton, OR 97003
For questions or additional information, please contact susan_ouellette@beaverton.k12.or.us
Committee Session Notes
- September 18, 2024
- October 23, 2024
- November 13, 2024
- December 3, 2024
- December 11, 2024
- January 14, 2025 - Publishers Presentations
- February 12, 2025
- February 26, 2025
September 18, 2024
-
Opening Remarks
-
Launch of important process
-
Appreciation of the team for participation, willingness to do the work and time
-
Literacy is very important to the district and a strong curriculum selection process is essential
-
Unique perspectives and experiences are brought to the team by each individual member and of value for sharing
-
Environment of the meetings will be respectful and safe when listening and sharing with each other
-
-
Committee Members
-
Names and roles shar
-
ed out by members
-
Language Arts / English Language Proficiency Materials 6-12 Selection Committee 2024-25
|
|
|
|
Arielle Ali
|
English Language Development Teacher - Aloha High School
|
Cassie (Catherine) Simentelli
|
Augmentative Communication Specialist Teacher on Special Assignment
|
Danette Foster
|
Teacher - Conestoga Middle School (AVID)
|
Darian Mendez
|
Student - Beaverton High School
|
Ethan Mao
|
Student - Westview High School
|
Gloria Gude
|
Newcomer Program Teacher on Special Assignment
|
Hannah Boucier
|
Teacher - Meadow Park Middle School
|
Jessica Loomis
|
Teacher - Westview High School
|
Juan Tellecha
|
Student - BASE
|
Katherine Hart
|
English Language Development/Dual Language Teacher on Special Assignment
|
Kathleen Valee
|
Teacher - Community School
|
Kaydi Taylor
|
Teacher - Stoller Middle School (Parent)
|
Kelly Laverne
|
Principal - Five Oaks Middle School
|
Kianna Ober
|
Parent - Aloha Huber Park, BASE, ACMA
|
Kim Harley -AHS
|
Parent - Aloha High School
|
Kirstie Guidoux
|
Assistant Principal - Conestoga Middle School
|
Kristin Hayward
|
Teacher - Tumwater Middle School
|
Lara Smith
|
Assistant Principal - Aloha High School
|
Maria Rodriguez Cuamatzi
|
Parent - Beaver Acres - Vose Elementary, Whitford Middle School
|
Nichole Carter
|
Middle School Language Arts Teacher on Special Assignment (Parent)
|
Nicole Deluca
|
Academic Coach - Meadow Park Middle School
|
Nujhat Ahmed
|
Parent - Conestoga Middle School
|
Patricia Kelly
|
Teacher - International School of Beaverton
|
Rebecca Ramirez Larson
|
High School Language Arts Teacher on Special Assignment (Parent)
|
Robin Kobrowski
|
Language Arts Administrator - District Office
|
Sara Hains
|
Teacher - Whitford Middle School
|
Sarah Blattner
|
Teacher - Southridge High School (AVID/LA)
|
Senthil Kumar Wasuki
|
Parent - Westview High School
|
Shannon Anderson
|
Principal - Cedar Park Middle School
|
Shirley Valadares
|
Special Education Assistant Director
|
Susan Ouellette
|
Committee Process Support - District Office
|
Taylor McKenna
|
English Language Development Teacher - Mt. View Middle School
|
Tiffany Mathes
|
Teacher - Beaverton High School
|
Tisa Meador
|
PK-12 Dual LanguageTeacher on Special Assignment
|
Toshiko Maurizio
|
English Language Proficiency Administrator - District Office
|
Veronica Galvan
|
Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Administrator - District Office
|
Schedule | |||
Date
|
Day
|
Time
|
Location
|
09/18/2024
|
Wednesday
|
4:30 - 6:30
|
DAO - Douglas Fir Board Room
|
10/16/2024
10/23/2024
|
Wednesday
|
4:30 - 6:30
|
DAO - Douglas Fir Board Room
|
11/13/2024
|
Wednesday
|
4:30 - 6:30
|
DAO - Douglas Fir Board Room
|
12/11/2024
|
Wednesday
|
4:30 - 6:30
|
DAO - Douglas Fir Board Room
|
01/22/2025
|
Wednesday
|
4:30 - 6:30
|
DAO - Community Room
|
02/12/2025
|
Wednesday
|
4:30 - 6:30
|
Douglas Fir Board Room
|
03/19/2025
|
Wednesday
|
4:30 - 6:30
|
DAO - Community Room
|
04/16/2025
|
Wednesday
|
4:30 - 6:30
|
DAO - Douglas Fir Room
|
05/14/2025
|
Wednesday
|
4:30 - 6:30
|
DAO - Douglas Fir Room
|
-
Meeting Observers
-
Staff, students and community members are invited to attend all meetings as non-participating observers. A sign in sheet will be available to observers
-
-
-
Timeline includes review of state approved materials for consideration of selection
-
Piloting will take place in several classrooms
-
First School Board reading will take place
-
BSD Selection Cycle
-
-
Voting members who have submitted a vote of “1” will be required to present justifications/arguments for their decision
-
Other committee members will present their justification/arguments for votes “2-5”
-
Clarifying questions will be posed and responded to
-
A second vote of 1-5 will occur
-
If less than 51% of votes are “1”, Robert's Rules of Order will be followed and any members voting “No” will be required to submit a Dissenting Opinion vote document to be included in the final report to the School Board and the decision of the majority will move forward.
-
5 - Strong Support
-
4 - Support
-
3 - Neutral
-
2 - Minimal Support, But Won’t Block
-
1 - No Support
-
Discussion
-
Consensus
-
Dissenting Opinion
-
Minority Report
-
-
Focus on equity for ALL students
-
Equity of Voice-Opportunity for all to voice their opinions and ideas (Use WAIT—Why am I talking?), encourage others to share, and active listening.
-
Honest and respectful dialogue
-
Challenge to think outside the box and reach beyond the status quo
-
Preparation as participants and facilitator (clearly stated purpose and outcomes, focus on the big picture outcome).
-
Be solution oriented, but be okay with multiple solutions
-
Honor different styles of learning and processing (i.e., think time, out loud thinking)
-
Honor all team members’ opinions, backgrounds and contributions
-
Honor team member’s schedules. Start and end meetings on time
-
Respect the process and committee members.
-
Table Group Discussion
-
Revisions, Additions, Omissions
-
Share Out
-
Decision Process
-
Recommendations:
-
Focus on equity for ALL students, staff and community by applying the district’s equity lens along the way.
-
-
-
Equity of Voice-Opportunity for all to voice their opinions and ideas (Use WAIT—Why am I talking?), encourage others to share, and active listening.
-
Honest and respectful dialogue that honors team member’s opinions, backgrounds and contributions.
-
Challenge to think outside the box and reach beyond the status quo
-
Preparation as participants and facilitator - clearly stated purpose and outcomes, focus on the big picture outcome.
-
Be solution process oriented, but and be okay with multiple solutions
-
Honor different styles of learning and processing (i.e., think time, out loud thinking)
-
Honor all team members’ opinions, backgrounds and contributions (does #3 address this)
-
Honor team member’s schedules. Start and end meetings on time
-
Respect Follow the process and committee members. Remove
-
Actively engage and participate in the process with intention.
-
Whose voice is and isn't represented in this decision?
-
Who does this decision benefit or burden?
-
Is this decision in alignment with the BSD Equity Policy?
-
Does this decision close or widen the access, opportunity and expectation gaps?
-
Two Areas of Selection Focus
-
K-5 Selection completed in May of 2024
-
English Language Proficiency materials selection
-
Slides House Bill 3198
-
Increase early literacy for children from birth to Grade 3
-
Reduce early literacy academic disparities for student groups that have historically experienced disparities
-
Increase support to parents and guardians to enable them to be partners in their children’s literacy skills & knowledge
-
Increase access to early literacy support that is research-aligned, culturally responsive, and student and family centered
-
Examination of data will occur during committee process
-
Shifts in learning have occurred all levels, not just early literacy (birth - grade 3)
-
Early Literacy Grant mandates that districts have several components in place (K-3)
-
Research Based Materials
-
Instructional Coaches
-
Extended Programs
-
Oregon’s Early Literacy Framework used extensively during the Elementary materials selection process
-
Important to review as part of secondary process
-
-
Pandemic impacted literacy proficiency in older grade levels
-
Science of Reading: research that is aligned with the ‘neurological and cognitive science studies of how brains process written words,’ and includes a broad collection of research from multiple fields of study including cognitive science, learning sciences, literacy research, and instructional science and research broadly.”
-
Research based practice
-
Shift of practice must be considered during materials selection process
-
Multiple voices and viewpoints need to be considered
-
What is going on in classrooms is a major consideration
-
Goal is to create an upward shift to make up for losses during the pandemic
-
Oregon Adolescent Literacy Framework Coming Soon
-
Committee asked to complete their summer reading assignment
-
Please complete Oregon’s Adolescent Literacy Framework
-
As you read, please highlight things you believe are critical for us to keep as a lens in our adoption work
-
If interested, please consider reading Oregon’s Early Literacy Framework
-
-
-
Focus of Work
-
Past practice was to consider material selection of ELD separate from Language Arts materials
-
K-5 was the first process to combine ELP and LA last year and was very successful
-
Reading League
-
EL/EB students may have a larger linguistic repertoire in more than one language, which should be considered when looking at the totality of a student’s literacy skills.
-
During instruction, opportunities to integrate language, literacy, writing, and content knowledge should be provided.
-
A wide variety of materials that ensure students develop reading skills should feature books and materials that build both foundational skills (e.g., controlled/decodable texts) and rich language and vocabulary, background knowledge, and comprehension skills (e.g., informational texts, narrative texts, poetry).
-
-
Science of Reading studies (some) include multilingual learners
-
Students must be able to see themselves in the literacy materials they are using
-
Much of what was learned during the Reading League’s work was incorporated into the ODE Early Literacy Framework
-
Foundational skills and oral skills are important for MLLs
-
Inclusivity and Belonging are emphasized in the Adolescent Literacy Framework
-
Creating an Environment of Inclusivity and Belonging
-
Translanguaging represents a powerful approach for teaching multilingual learners by inviting them to use multiple languages.
-
Incorporating students’ home languages as a strategy for building on adolescents’ community, cultural, and familial strengths.
-
-
Slide Deck - Growing Language and Literacy
-
-
The Framework outlines the need to incorporate strategies that are cross disciplinary and discipline specific and this book provides context and specific strategies for integrating language, literacy, content, and culture all in one!
-
The Framework emphasizes asset-based instruction for multilingual learners and this book includes student stories, strategies for looking beyond labels, and building a sense of belonging in the classroom.
-
The Framework outlines the need for a variety of strategies and this book provides a plethora of visual literacy strategies, building oracy, building reading and writing skills, and how to incorporate multidimensional strategies to include technology integration.
-
This book provides an overview of the research on language acquisition from a secondary literacy perspective.
-
Newcomer Student may need additional materials to supplement selected materials
-
Tier one is core content instruction - addresses state standards as required by law
-
Tier two is intervention to provide additional instruction as needed by students
-
Is the committee looking at only tier one materials, or also tier two?
-
Some publishers provide both
-
-
Changes in secondary - Schedules, Co-Teaching create impacts that may be reflected in materials
-
Resources to be used will provide strategies. Appreciate MLLs being included
-
Many MLLs are below grade level and need to be taken into consideration. Students should not be graduating functionally illiterate
-
Skills need to be built in K-3 has been the goal, but may need to be adjusted
-
Tier 2 and Tier 3 are needed and need to be considered
-
Science of Reading, shifts, abilities vary greatly in the classroom. Staff training is needed. Students need to be introduced to the science of reading
-
Growing Language and Literacy is a wonderful resource and can be used across content areas. Multilingual lens needs to be applied in all materials selection
-
Links need be created to meet the needs of all students no matter their literacy skill levels when selecting materials
-
Twice identified students need to be considered
-
Teens and pre-teens literacy needs are much different than elementary students
-
-
Meeting Notes, Documents and More
-
Under Construction
-
October 23, 2024
-
The state establishes the cycle for adoption.
-
The materials must be in accordance with the National Materials Accessibility Standards (NIMAS) - for individuals who are blind or have another disability that impairs access to printed material. This means students must have access to alternate formats.
-
The adoption process must include opportunities for community and parent involvement.
-
SECTION 1: Creating an Environment of Inclusivity and Belonging
-
SECTION 2: Reaching All Learners
-
SECTION 3: Teaching Reading Strategies and Skills
-
SECTION 4: Teaching Wr
-
iting Practices and Strategies
-
SECTION 5. Building Literacy to Strengthen Disciplinary Learning
-
SECTION 6: Using Assessment to Accelerate Learning
-
Table Group Activity: Jigsaw
-
Highlight what is critical as a lens for the instructional materials selection work
-
-
SECTION 1: Creating an Environment of Inclusivity and Belonging
- Inclusive Asset-Based Environments
- Build on home, community and cultural practices
- Art, Music, Cooking Story-Telling
- Culturally Responsive Materials and Practices
- Transform Power Dynamics, Generate Questions/Voice and Choice
- Embracing Linguistic Strengths
- Slang, Social Media, Visual Representation
- Transformative Social & Emotional Learning
- Self-Awareness, Identity, Problem-Solving
- High Expectations and Responsive Support
- Collaboration, Revisions, Multiple Opportunities
- Encouragement and Belief
- Language Access
- American Sign Language (ASL), Braille, Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)
- Build on home, community and cultural practices
SECTION 2: Reaching All Learners
- Core and More
- All Contents
- Differentiated Ins
- Explicit Instruction
- Flexible Grouping
- Assistive Technology
- Formative Assessment
- Interventions
- Decoding
- Fluency
- Comprehension
- Self-Assessment
- Stretch Text
- All Contents
- Works in Progress
- Supportive Schedules
- Inclusion of students with disabilities
- Multilingual learners
- TAG
SECTION 3: Teaching Reading Strategies and Skills
- Reading Apprenticeship
- Social
- Text selectins: interest level
- Personal
- Metacognition
- Knowledge building
- Accessibility
- Cognitive
- Comprehension & reading strategies
- Parking Lot
- How will strategies reach across the disciplines?
- Will classroom libraries stay?
- Will we purchase digital books?
- Social
SECTION 4: Teaching Writing Practices and Strategies
- Agency
- Goal setting
- Peer review
- Choice
- Transfer
- Reading and writing could be different in another setting
- Products approach
- Process approach
- Practices approach
- Pathways approach
- Purpose
- Multimodal writing, process writing
- Awareness of rhetorical situation
- Culturally Responsive
- Rubrics
- Models/Exemplars
SECTION 5. Building Literacy to Strengthen Disciplinary Learning
- Disciplinary Learning (what)
- Highlights the importance of understanding district linguistic features of different disciplines
- (why) Disciplinary literacy importance
- Provides educational framework and gateway for students to become experts in their chosen field
- Almost all disciplines use reading and writing to communicate and expand students knowledge base
- Development
- Social cultura;l theory of learning is that individuals construct knowledge through interactions
- Integrating culturally responsive practices develops a more critical and reflective student body
SECTION 6: Using Assessment to Accelerate Learning
- Purpose: to monitor progress, to inform instruction, to accelerate learning
- Assessments should account for different backgrounds, culturally responsive, multiple opportunities, being multimodal, including language support tools when needed and involve self and peer assessment - feedback, and being a tool for intervention, Allow for student choice and agency and being aligned with language proficiency level of the learner
- Types of assessment
- Formative: immediately used for instructional decision making - the bulk of what we do. Students engage in this through peer feedback and self-assessment
- Interim: Periodic standards based targeting specific targets to inform how well students are learning
- Summative: state testing to collect data on state standards at grade level
Early Literacy Framework (K-5) - Guiding resources for K-5 LA / ELP material selection
- Strong focus on english language learners
Adolescent Literacy Framework (6-12)
- Currently in draft form. Final version scheduled for publication in January
- Committee will reference in draft form during initial work
Timeline
- Summer 2024 Begin Development of Adolescent Literacy Framework (OALF)
- Winter 202 Publish Adolescent Literacy Framework
- 25-26 SY Comprehensive Literacy State Development (Federal $ for pK-12)
- 25-26 SY Develop Support and Resources for Implementation of OALF
- Early Literacy grant was required and included specific requirements in programing, tutoring research based materials, instructional coaches, summer school and professional development. All requirements need to be met in order to access the grant funds
- Adolescent Literacy Comprehensive Literacy development legislation is planned. It is currently unknown if secondary funding will be a component. Possibly competitive instead of comprehensive.
- Building Literacy to Strengthen Disciplinary Knowledge (Slide)
- Specific at the higher grade level
- Students across the country are currently below level in skills
- Direction to be provided by ODE and will address all content areas, not just literacy
- OALF (Oregon Adolescent Literacy Framework)
- Does not include teaching students to read
- The framework is designed to support students in grades 6-12 who are still developing grade level literacy skills.
- The framework does not address students who have not yet mastered decoding and oral reading fluency skills.
- Secondary teachers’ training and preparation focuses on teaching their subject matter.
- Secondary teachers often have not received training on how to teach students to learn to read
- Guiding Principles
- Belonging, motivation and engagement are essential to adolescent literacy learning
- Adolescents are brimming with literary, cultural and linguistic strengths
- Literacy unlocks opportunities for every student to pursue their interests and be challenged within and across disciplines
- Literacy skills and strategy instruction matters at every grade and in every content area
- A comprehensive school-wide approach supports equitable literacy instruction
- Multilingualism benefits everyone
- Families and communities strengthen school-based learning and support long-term goals
Data Review and Protocol
- Oregon Statewide Assessment System - OSAS
- Pre American College Testing - PACT
- English Language Proficiency Assessment - ELPA
- STAR Screener Data
To be continued at the November Meeting
November 13, 2024
-
86 Responses
-
Five Oaks MS - 6th grade (WHS feeder), now 8th grade
-
Mt. View MS - 7th grade (AHS/MHS feeder) now 9th grade
-
Conestoga MS - 8th grade (SRHS feeder) now 10th grade
-
Sunset HS - 9th grade, now 11th grade
-
Beaverton HS - 10th grade, now 12th grade
-
Adding student voice and agency, specifically from historically underserved & underrepresented populations, in the quality curriculum materials selection.
-
Students choose what and how they learn in BSD’s Language Arts classes with co-teaching and integrated English Language Proficiency models.
-
Student voice is essential to the materials selection process
-
Traditionally not representative of all students
-
Student survey - Listening Sessions
- Phase 1: Predictions
- Surfacing perspectives, beliefs, assumptions, predictions, possibilities, questions and expectations Group Input
- Phase 2: Observations
- Analyzing the data for patterns, trends, surprises, and questions
- Committee Share Out After Reviewing Data (LINK)
-
December 4, 2024
-
HQIM
-
IMET
-
BSD Priorities
-
Book Study
-
December 3, 2024
-
Table Group Discussion
-
Table discussion: What is your earliest memory of learning or hearing another language? How did you learn this language? How did you feel hearing this language? How did this help you connect to culture?
-
Break up into two groups: middle level and high level
-
In tables, discuss key strategies that are essential for each of the levels
-
Narrow down strategies to top 5 strategies in poster
-
Compare strategies from middle and high levels
-
Essential Questions as we look to create priorities:
-
Are there similarities and differences of key strategies for multilingual learners between levels?
-
Are there similarities and differences to the Adolescent Literacy Framework?
-
Metacognition
-
Comprehension
-
Reading Strategies
-
Discipline
-
Multi modal writing
-
Multi dimensional
-
Vocabulary building across all content areas
-
Oracy - not included as much as needed in the Framework
-
-
BSD has 6,000 multilingual learners and 1,200 newcomer students
-
What are key strategies for newcomer students?
-
-
Strategies noted at High School table groups
-
Reading
-
Multi- modal - different ways to access
-
Relevanent, high impact text
-
-
Writing
-
Authentic opportunities for real world applications
-
-
Graphic organizers
-
Visuals
-
Oracy
-
Interaction, social, peer with frames
-
-
Spiral curriculum
-
Multiple Opportunities
-
Excellent multicultural visuals and realia
-
Strong technology integration
-
Embedded interactive activities
-
In all four domains: reading, writing, speaking, listening
-
-
Routines and rituals
-
Vocabulary, grammar, hard work
-
Multiple Opp
-
-
Strategies noted at Middle School table groups
-
Routines and structures
-
Digital tools
-
Sence frames/scripts (oral and written)
-
Vocabulary
-
VIsual Cues
-
Building Connections
-
Thinking Maps
-
Anticipatory Set
-
Personal Identity Reflections
-
-
Self-Monitoring
-
Visuals
-
Intentional Grouping
-
Language Partner
-
Think Pair Share
-
Peer Edit & Feedback
-
Anticipatory Set
-
-
Language Supports
-
Sentence Frames
-
Scripts
-
Translated Materials and tools
-
-
-
-
ELP IMET Category 2 (Grades 5/6-8) - Handout D
-
ELP IMET Category 3 (Grades 9-12) - Handout E
-
The Language Arts Adoption Criteria is adopted by the State Board of Education
-
There is criteria/rubric for each content area to be selected.
-
The adoption criteria includes Non-Negotiable (NN) Criteria and Alignment Criteria (AC)
-
NN - 100%
-
AC - 66% overall
-
What is HQIM?
-
“Oregon Department of Education (ODE) is committed to supporting Oregon districts in providing students with equitable access to high-quality instructional materials (HQIM) that are aligned to standards, culturally responsive, and reflect evidence-based practices.”
-
“In Oregon, HQIM are basal instructional materials that include access to grade-level standards, inclusive practices, support for teachers and students, and embedded assessments.”
-
“Adopted instructional materials in Oregon are subject, by law, to an evaluation process and must meet established specifications and criteria in order to be approved for use in Oregon classrooms.”
-
-
The importance of High Quality Instructional Materials from ODE:
-
“A growing and compelling research base suggests that high quality instructional materials can yield improvements in student learning outcomes equal to or greater than many interventions that are often more costly . . . [high quality instructional materials] “are about bringing equity to the district - a shared experience creating a floor, but not a ceiling, around the teaching and learning that happens in our classrooms.”
-
Standouts:
-
Equity is important
-
Responsibility to make sure that all students have opportunity for education regardless of their strengths and or weaknesses
-
Important for everyone (teachers) to be using high quality materials
-
-
-
-
Core Adopted Materials
-
Supplementary Adopted Materials
-
Teacher Selected Materials
-
BSD Priorities
-
Timeline
-
ODE Language Arts Instructional Materials Review (2021)
-
-
Guiding Question: Using the research and best practices outlined in the adolescent literacy framework and book study, what additional priorities/lenses do we need to bring to our review?
-
K-5 Priorities Sample - Handout F
-
Staff Survey Team Input from November meeting - Handout G
-
Student Survey Team Input from November meeting - Handout H
-
Question: Do the Middle School and High School instructional materials have to come from the same source? Answer: They do not have to
-
Question: Is ELP going to come from the same source? It is the hope that the core materials would be the same. Different materials may have to be selected for newcomer students. A separate MLD staff group will review materials for the best option for newcomers.
-
Materials need to be available in both English and Spanish for both dual language and ELs
-
BSD Equity Lens
-
Whose voice is and isn't represented in this decision?
-
Who does this decision benefit or burden?
-
Is this decision in alignment with the BSD Equity Policy?
-
Does this decision close or widen the access, opportunity and expectation gaps?
-
-
-
Group Work: As a table, generate a list of priorities/lenses. Share out with the group
-
Local district criteria
-
Table Group Sheet - Notetaker Sheet
-
-
Narrow down priority list and create one for 6-12 - Group Consensus
- Group Input
- Literacy Component
- Multicultural (visuals, languages, student background shots, etc.)
- Student interest and need (real world applications)
- Rubrics and exemplars
- Multiple genres in texts/writing prompts
- Home school connection
- Culturally inclusive
- Current topics
- Can ELA curriculum offer assessments reflecting the ELP standards and align with our integrated services model?
- Priority
- Teachers and students can reasonably complete core content within school year
- Materials/various levels scaffolding including those read, write, speak below grade level or are not proficient in English
- Resources for tier 2, 3 intervention
- Keep classroom libraries and diversify reading levels
- Materials culturally and linguistically responsive
- Multiple levels (differentiation)
- Teacher user friendly with scope and sequence
- Dual language and other languages (authentic texts)
- Tier 2 and 3 interventions ( embedded and/or included)
- Dual language (authentic translations)
- Oracy as NN
- Reading, writing, speaking and listening every day
- Teacher friendly materials (easy to unpack)
- Keeping and maintaining classroom libraries
- Culturally relevant
- Vocabulary (academic and syntax) explicitly taught (NN) and connected to content
- TAG learners
- Dual language and other languages
- Student voice and student belonging, agency - celebratory, all voices represented
- Culturally and linguistically responsive and sustaining
- Multilingual learners
- Multiple levels (differentiation): TAG, neurodivise learners (including dyslexia) , multilingual learners
- Formative assessments and progressive monitoring
- User friendly with scope and sequence with teacher supports
- Diverse writing modes and true writing process
- Classroom libraries (keep)
- Reading, writing and oracy every day
- Critical thinking and rigor
- Development of writing skills
- Research skills
- Culminating tasks
- Group Input
- Next Steps
-
Next Steps
-
Development of Rubric
-
Be ready to review publishers on 12/11
-
12/11 we will select publishers to invite on 1/14
-
-
Homework
-
If you would like, start reviewing publisher lists
-
ODE 6-12 LA Adoption List - Handout I
-
ODE 6-12 ELP Adoption List - Handout J
-
-
-
If possible please bring device to Dec 11, 2024 meeting